Wynn v. State

Wynn was convicted of possessing intoxicating liquor, the court overruled his motion for a new trial, based upon the usual general grounds and certain special grounds, and he excepted.

The gist of the evidence follows: The defendant and his wife lived with his father and the father’s wife. According to the father’s testimony, he owned the residence and premises, but the defendant had access to the entire place. The father further testified that the whisky found did not belong to him or to his wife. The place contained about two acres of land, the lot was “kinder long,” and the garden was about…