Weinfurther v. Source Services Corp. Employees Profit Sharing Plan & Trust
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
LEGGE, District Judge.
Defendants have moved for summary judgment on all causes of action. The motion has been opposed, argued, and sub mitted for decision. The court has reviewed the moving papers, the opposing papers, the very substantial factual record filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, 1 the arguments of counsel, and the applicable authorities. The court concludes that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that judgment should be entered in favor of defendants.
I
Plaintiffs were employed by Source Services…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Claude Wardle, Sr. v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Lojek v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- William A. Clark v. Lauren Young Tire Center Profit Sharing Trust, Alan A. Brown, and Alan Brown Tire Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ward v. MaloneyDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2005
- Brower v. Comark Merchandising, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1996