Legal Opinion

Ward v. Maloney

District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Decided August 23, 2005No. 1:05CV00424PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

OSTEEN, District Judge.

Pro se Plaintiff Mark A. Ward brings this action against Defendant Peter E. Ma-loney, the plan administrator of the LIN Broadcasting Corporation Retirement Plan, a retirement plan governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq. Plaintiff, a Plan participant, claims Defendant failed to comply with Plaintiffs request for a summary of material modifications pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1024(b)(4) and seeks a statutory penalty under 29 U.S.C. § 1132(e)(1). This matter is now before the court on the parties’ cross…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Ross v. Communications Satellite Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  5. Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. SchoonejongenSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Vincent v. LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2010
  2. Hartman v. Dana Holding Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2013
  3. Gibson v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API