Legal Opinion

Brower v. Comark Merchandising, Inc.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided December 10, 1996No. Civ. 95-6131 (WHW)Published

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED OPINION

WALLS, District Judge.

This matter arises on the motion of plaintiff Sondra Brower (“Brower”) for summary judgment on her complaint against her former employer. Comark Merchandising, Inc. (“Comark”) is a national supplier of in-store marketing and promotional systems. Richard Krautsack (“Krautsack”) and Kenneth McNerney (“McNemey”) were, at the time the acts at issue took place, administrators of Comark’s employee benefit plan. 1 The defendants (collectively “Comark”) file a cross-motion for summary judgment. The Court has jurisdiction pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Cogdell v. Hospital Center at OrangeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  5. DiTrolio v. AntilesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API