Carter v. State

OPINION

KIRSCH, Judge.

Jimmie Carter appeals his probation revocation. He presents several issues, one of which is dispositive:

Whether the State presented a sufficient evidentiary foundation to admit a laboratory technician’s testimony concerning urinalysis results.

We reverse.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Carter pled guilty to operating while intoxicated,1 a Class D felony. The trial court placed him on probation for one and one-half years. As a condition of probation, the court prohibited Carter from using illegal drugs and required him to provide urine samples *1114for drug testing. In the first six…