Libertin v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLeedom, J.
Respondent, plaintiff below, agreed to sell to Mary Denker a 1949 Ford automobile on which appellant had issued a policy of insurance. Assignment - of the insurance was not involved in the transaction. At the trial it was respondent’s contention that the agreement to sell was conditional upon Miss Denker’s approval of the car after driving it, while appellant contended that the negotiations that took place prior to delivery of the car to Miss Denker actually amounted to an absolute sale. Following the negotiations and on the same day they took place Miss Denker drove the automobile and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Auto Owners' Protective Exchange v. EdwardsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922
3Cited by6 opinions
- Armijo v. Foundation Reserve Insurance CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
- Hart v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- Rogers v. American Fidelity & Casualty Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Miller v. St. Paul Insurance CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964
- Libertin v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.