Legal Opinion

In Re EC

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 2, 2010No. 09-040PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 A.3d 1007 (2010)

2010 VT 50

In re E.C.

No. 09-040.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

June 2, 2010.

Present: DOOLEY, JOHNSON, SKOGLUND, BURGESS, JJ., and REIBER, C.J.

ENTRY ORDER

¶ 1. Appellant Department of Disabilities, Aging and Independent Living appeals a decision by the Human Services Board reversing the Department's substantiation of abuse by petitioner E.C. The Department contends that the Board misapplied 33 V.S.A. § 6902(1)(E) in its determination that petitioner's conduct did not meet the definition of abuse and that the Board did not set forth sufficient findings to form the basis for a…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Krupp v. KruppSupreme Court of Vermont · 1967
  3. DeBusk v. Johns Hopkins HospitalCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  4. MacDonough-Webster Lodge No. 26 v. WellsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  5. Salmon v. Department of Public Health & Addiction ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In re R.H.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  2. In re M.E.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  3. State v. Green Mountain FutureSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  4. In re M.E., JuvenileSupreme Court of Vermont · 2019
  5. McNally v. Department of PathSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API