McNally v. Department of Path
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1. Claimant Joanna McNally appeals a decision by the Commissioner of Labor after a contested hearing denying her workers’ compensation benefits. She argues the Commissioner erred as a matter of law by not applying internal Department of Labor ease law to determine whether claimant’s injury was the result of a normal activity of daily living. Because the Commissioner’s decision fails to make necessary findings or conclusions, we remand for further proceedings.
¶ 2. The material facts are uncontested. Claimant worked for employer State of Vermont for sixteen years in various administrative…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Krupp v. KruppSupreme Court of Vermont · 1967
- Morin v. Essex Optical/The HartfordSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
- LaFountain v. Vermont Employment Security BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
- In re E.C.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2010
- Cyr v. McDERMOTT'S, INC.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Houle v. Ethan Allen, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2011
- State v. Aita GurungSupreme Court of Vermont · 2025
- Cheney v. City of MontpelierSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
- McNally v. DEPARTMENT OF PATHSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
- McNally v. DEPARTMENT OF PATHSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.