Legal Opinion

McNally v. Department of Path

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 28, 2010No. 09-450PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1. Claimant Joanna McNally appeals a decision by the Commissioner of Labor after a contested hearing denying her workers’ compensation benefits. She argues the Commissioner erred as a matter of law by not applying internal Department of Labor ease law to determine whether claimant’s injury was the result of a normal activity of daily living. Because the Commissioner’s decision fails to make necessary findings or conclusions, we remand for further proceedings.

¶ 2. The material facts are uncontested. Claimant worked for employer State of Vermont for sixteen years in various administrative…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Krupp v. KruppSupreme Court of Vermont · 1967
  2. Morin v. Essex Optical/The HartfordSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
  3. LaFountain v. Vermont Employment Security BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
  4. In re E.C.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  5. Cyr v. McDERMOTT'S, INC.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Houle v. Ethan Allen, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  2. State v. Aita GurungSupreme Court of Vermont · 2025
  3. Cheney v. City of MontpelierSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  4. McNally v. DEPARTMENT OF PATHSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  5. McNally v. DEPARTMENT OF PATHSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API