Houston General Insurance Co. v. Teague
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JAMES, Justice.
This is a workmen’s compensation case wherein the Second Injury Fund is a Third Party Cross-Defendant, and involves interpretation of Article 8306, Sections 12c and 12c-l, as amended in 1971. Appellant Houston General Insurance Co. raises these two specific questions:(1) Whether a carrier is entitled to an offset for prior compensable disabilities; and(2) In the alternative, whether a carrier has the right to proceed against the Second Injury Fund in general injury cases. We answer both questions in the negative and affirm the trial court’s judgment.
The injured workman,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Transport Insurance Company v. MabraTexas Supreme Court · 1972
- Second Injury Fund v. KeatonTexas Supreme Court · 1961
- Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n v. HaunschildCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- TEXAS EMPLOYERS'INSURANCE ASSOCIATION v. CreswellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
3Cited by6 opinions
- Second Injury Fund v. TomonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Second Injury Fund v. American Motorists Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Injury Fund St. Tx. v. ConradCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1978
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.