Legal Opinion
State v. the Crabtree Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 23, 1944No. 33,819PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Streissguth, Justice.
Defendant is a corporation engaged in the business of selling cigarettes at wholesale in Minneapolis. Having sold 57 cartons to a retail dealer in that city, it was charged with and convicted of the offense of selling cigarettes without a license, contrary to a city ordinance.
The ordinance requires a license of all persons, companies, and corporations who sell cigarettes, without distinction as between retailers, jobbers, wholesalers, and manufacturers. It was enacted, as appears from its title, for the “Good Order of the City, and the Suppression of Vice and Intemperance…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Holden v. HardySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Gundling v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Standard Oil Co. v. City of MarysvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Austin v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Cook v. Marshall CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hoang Minh Ly v. NystromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Mangold Midwest Co. v. Village of RichfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Blumenthal v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
- Welsh v. City of OronoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Village of Brooklyn Center v. RippenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.