Legal Opinion

Federal Insurance v. Watnick

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 17, 1992PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Smith, J.

This appeal arises from a car accident that occurred in the Province of Quebec, Canada. On September 6, 1988, Jay and Marianna Watnick, residents of New York State, were driving through St. Agathe, Quebec, when their automobile was struck by a vehicle operated by Jay Anderson, a resident of Quebec. Jay and Marianna Watnick were severely injured.

When the accident occurred, the Watnicks were insured under a motor vehicle liability policy issued by Federal Insurance Company, a New York State insurance carrier. The policy contained an uninsured motorist endorsement…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. MATTER OF VALENTE v. Prudential Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Rowell v. Utica Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Federal Insurance v. WatnickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Curran v. Progressive Northwestern Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Hill v. American Family Mutual InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Horace Mann Insurance Co. v. AdkinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. HurleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Andriaccio v. Borg & Borg, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API