Legal Opinion
Allen v. Peacock TV LLC
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided July 12, 2024No. 1:24-cv-00971Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND MICHAEL ALLEN, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No.: BAH-24-971 PEACOCK TV LLC ET AL., Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiff Michael Allen (“Plaintiff”) filed the above-captioned complaint pro se together with a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF 2, which shall be granted. Plaintiff also filed a supplement to the complaint. ECF 4. Section 1915(e)(2)(B) of 28 U.S.C. requires this Court to conduct an initial screening of this complaint and dismissal of any complaint that (i) is frivolous or malicious; (ii) fails to…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Bruce Beaudett v. City of Hampton City Attorneys A. Paul Burton and W. Stephen Moore Judge T.H. Wilson, II and Judge Nelson T. OvertonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Kolon Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.