Legal Opinion

G.H. Mumm & Cie (Societe Vinicole De Champagne Successeurs of New York, Inc.) v. Desnoes & Geddes, Ltd., Cross-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided October 25, 1990No. 89-1696, 89-1697PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PLAGER, Circuit Judge.

Appellant G.H. Mumm & Cie (Societe Vinicole de Champagne Successeurs of New York, Inc.) (“Mumm”) opposes registration of a mark by Cross-Appellant Desnoes & Geddes, Ltd. (“Desnoes”). The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) dismissed Mumm’s opposition. Desnoes cross-appeals from a decision of the Board dismissing Desnoes’ counterclaim to cancel Mumm’s Registration No. 395,907 (’907). As to both dismissals, we affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

On June 16, 1942, the ’907 registration of a mark which included a diagonal stripe, lined for red, was granted to Mumm. The registered…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re E. I. DuPont DeNemours & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  2. Yamaha International Corporation v. Hoshino Gakki Co., Ltd., Assignee of Hoshino Gakki Ten Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  3. Levi Strauss & Co. v. Blue Bell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  4. Miguel Torres v. Cantine Torresella S.R.L., Assignee of S. Margherita S.P.A.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  5. Nina Ricci, S.A.R.L. v. E.T.F. Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Larry Marshak v. Faye Treadwell Treadwell Drifters, Inc the Drifters, Inc. Bowen Agency Ltd/admiral TalentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  2. J & J Snack Foods Corporation v. McDonald CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  3. First Bank v. First Bank System, Inc. And First Bank, Fsb, Formerly Known as Metropolitan Federal Bank, FsbCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  4. In Re Louisiana Fish Fry Products, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
  5. The Hoover Company v. Royal Appliance Mg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API