Legal Opinion

City of Kingman v. Berry

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1889PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Kingman District Court. PROSECUTION for the violation of a city ordinance. From, a judgment against him at the May term, 1888, the defendant Berry appeals. The facts appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

JohnstoN, J.:

G-eorge F. Berry was prosecuted in the police court and convicted of a violation of a certain city ordinance of the city of Kingman. He was sentenced to pay a fine of $3. From that judgment he appealed to the district court, where he was tried before the court with a jury, and was again convicted, and again adjudged to pay a fine of $3, together with the costs of the prosecution. He now appeals to this court.

The principal objection urged against the conviction is the insufficiency of the complaint. It was drawn under an ordinance of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. KnowlesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  2. Buckland v. GoitSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  3. City of Cherokee v. FoxSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  4. West v. City of ColumbusSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. DunnSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  2. James v. LoganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  3. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  4. State v. JessupSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  5. State v. CombsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API