Legal Opinion

City of Cherokee v. Fox

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1885PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Crawford District Court. At tbe April Term, 1884, of the district court, the defendant Fox was convicted and sentenced to pay a fine of $5 and the costs of the prosecution, for a violation of a certain ordinance of the city of Cherokee. He appeals. The opinion states the material facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

The defendant, J. F. Fox, was tried before E. M. Bogle, police judge of the city of' Cherokee, on a complaint for violating a certain city ordinance. After conviction, he appealed to the district court, where he was tried *17before the court without a jury, and was again convicted, and was sentenced to pay a fine of five dollars and the costs of the prosecution. He now appeals to this court.

The defendant claims that both the ordinance and the complaint under which he was convicted are void, and that the evidence introduced on the trial does…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Newton v. AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  2. City of Topeka v. GillettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ex parte HaskellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Quong Wing v. KirkendallMontana Supreme Court · 1909
  3. In re MartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  4. State v. HunterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  5. City of Kingman v. BerrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1889

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API