Legal Opinion

Manuel v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 14, 1990No. 1511, September Term, 1989PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRITY, Judge.

Appellants Edward Manuel, Charles Onwuneme, Celestine Aniunoh, Cajetan Ohakwe, and Joshua Brewer were charged with conspiracies to possess and to distribute heroin and with other crimes involving controlled dangerous substances (CDS). All of the appellants were convicted of conspiracy to distribute heroin. All of the appellants except Onwuneme were convicted of conspiracy to possess heroin with intent to distribute. Appellant Manuel was also convicted of conspiracy to distribute cocaine. In addition, appellant Aniunoh was convicted of conspiracy to distribute cocaine and six…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Illinois v. VitaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Fisher v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. Tapscott v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  3. Emory v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  4. Massie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  5. Ogonowski v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API