Pemberton v. State

The appellants were convicted upon a charge of having unlawfully exhibited, to persons named, “ for gain and to win money a certain gambling device,” the name of which was to the grand jurors unknown.

Error is assigned upon the overruling of motions to quash and in arrest of judgment, and upon the exclusion of an an- ' swer to a question propounded in cross-examination to one of the witnesses for the State.

The last assignment presents no question. It should have been upon the overruling of the motion for a new trial. The cases are too numerous for citation, which hold that'error assigned upon…