Webb v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
Plaintiff is a former Air Force enlisted man. He appears before the court seeking back pay and retirement pay. Presently pending is defendant’s motion to dismiss. Two grounds are offered in support of the motion. Defendant first contends that the claim for retirement pay should be dismissed under RUSCC 12(b)(1) because the *24court lacks jurisdiction to hear it. The second ground for dismissal is that no part of the action is ripe for resolution and the entire claim should be dismissed under RUSCC 12(b)(4). For the reasons discussed below, the claim is dismissed without…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Orloff v. WilloughbySupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Lake Carriers' Assn. v. MacMullanSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gilligan v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. ShimerSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Cardillo v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gant v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
- Crawford v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002