Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jimmy Ferrell Cummings v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided March 24, 2011No. 14-10-00107-CRPublished

1DissentJohn S. Anderson, Justice

The majority has concluded there was no egregious error in appellant’s jury charge. I write separately today because I believe there was error in the jury charge and would reverse and remand this case for a new trial.

*134I. The Trial Court Erred By Not Sua Sponte Issuing a Jury Instruction Under Section 38.23 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.

Appellant argues the trial court had a duty to sua sponte issue a jury instruction that evidence obtained in contravention of the U.S. or Texas constitutions may not be used against a defendant. His belief in the responsibility of the trial court is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Hutch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  5. Madden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API