Jimmy Ferrell Cummings v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1DissentJohn S. Anderson, Justice
The majority has concluded there was no egregious error in appellant’s jury charge. I write separately today because I believe there was error in the jury charge and would reverse and remand this case for a new trial.
*134I. The Trial Court Erred By Not Sua Sponte Issuing a Jury Instruction Under Section 38.23 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.
Appellant argues the trial court had a duty to sua sponte issue a jury instruction that evidence obtained in contravention of the U.S. or Texas constitutions may not be used against a defendant. His belief in the responsibility of the trial court is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Hutch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Madden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.