Webber v. Barry
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Saginaw. (Gage, J.) Trespass. Defendants bring error. Tbe facts are stated in tbe opinions.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
Jpon the argument of this case, I was inclined to think that error had been committed in some of the proceedings upon the trial. A subsequent careful examination of the record leads me to the conclusion that the verdict and the judgment of the court below should stand.
I shall only refer here to the points raised in the case that seemed to me, on the argument, to have been erroneously decided by the circuit judge.
It struck me quite forcibly, fit first, that Davitt should not. have been allowed to act as an attorney in the case against the defendants; and also that the witness James B. Walsh…
2Cited by9 opinions
- People v. AuerbachMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- People v. ThackerMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Michel v. McKennaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
- Ward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
- Ludwigsen v. LarsenMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.