Legal Opinion

Ward v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided January 16, 1926No. A-5188PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.

From a conviction in the county court of Dewey county for a misdemeanor, the plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, has appealed.

Several assignments of error are argued in the brief, none of which have any merit except the third. This assignment is that, during the pendency of the prosecution against the defendant, Hoyt & Butler, attorneys, on two different occasions appeared as counsel for the defendant, and, upon the trial of the case, this firm, by Fred L. !H|oyt, a member of the firm, appeared for and assisted in the prosecution and conducted the cross-examination of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. GeroldIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. In re BooneU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1897
  4. State v. HowardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  5. Steeley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1920

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. BrittonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. State v. ChambersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. State v. LeighSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955
  4. State v. Detroit MotorsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  5. People v. DoyleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API