Legal Opinion
Ladzinski v. MEBA Pension Trust
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided January 17, 1997No. Civil Y-96-874PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOSEPH H. YOUNG, Senior District Judge.
This suit arises from a dispute over the amount of pension benefits Peter J. Ladzin-ski (“Ladzinski”) is eligible to receive from the MEBA Pension Trust (the “Pension Plan”). Ladzinski filed a three count complaint challenging the calculation of his pension benefits to which Defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment.
I. Facts
A. The Pension Plan
The Pension Plan is a multi employer/employee pension benefit plan within the meaning of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”). The Pension Plan results from collective…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- National Labor Relations Board v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- De Nobel v. Vitro Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- John Doe Firm Doe v. Group Hospitalization & Medical Services, D/B/A Blue Cross and Blue Shield of the National Capital AreaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Robert J. Batchelor v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 861 Pension and Retirement FundCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cost Management Services, Inc. v. City of LakewoodWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- Schneider v. Local 103 I.B.E.W. Health PlanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Lipton v. Consumers Union of the United States, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Quinn v. Thomas H. Lee Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Cost Mgmt. Servs. v. City of LakewoodWashington Supreme Court · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.