Legal Opinion
Quinn v. Thomas H. Lee Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 24, 1999No. 95 Civ. 2799(JES)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SPRIZZO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Marianne Quinn commenced the instant action against defendants Thomas H. Lee Company and Thomas H. Lee (“Lee Defendants”), Diet Center Worldwide, Inc. (“DCWI”), United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company (“USF & G”), and Francis Teti (“Teti”) (collectively “defendants”). This action arises from the termination of two of plaintiffs Diet Center, Inc. (“DCI”) franchises. She alleges claims of conspiracy, breach of contract, negligence, and breach of fiduciary duty. Pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- L.B. v. Town of ChesterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Lord Day & Lord v. Socialist Republic of VietnamDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001