Legal Opinion
Chickasha Cotton Oil Company v. Hancock
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 22, 1957No. 37012Published
1Opinion of the Court
306 P.2d 330 (1957)
CHICKASHA COTTON OIL COMPANY, A Corporation, and Producers Co-Operative Oil Mill, A Corporation, Plaintiffs in Error,
v.
H.B. HANCOCK and Doyle Hancock, Defendants in Error.
No. 37012.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
January 22, 1957.
Melton, McElroy & Vaughn, Chickasha, Bulla, Melone & Meister, Oklahoma City, Tolbert & Gillespie, Hobart, for plaintiffs in error.
Carder & Carder, Hobart, for defendants in error.
BLACKBIRD, Justice.
In the action, out of which this appeal arose, defendants in error, partners in the ranching and cattle-raising business, obtained a general verdict and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Phillips v. Newport Et Ux.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1945
- Swift & Co. v. Morgan & SturdivantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
- Chickasha Cotton Oil Company v. HancockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. LevyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.