Legal Opinion
Rush v. State Human Rights Appeal Board
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 11, 1985PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298 to review an order of the respondent State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated December 30,1983, affirming an order of the State Division of Human Rights, dated July 1, 1982, dismissing the petitioner’s complaint upon a finding that there was no probable cause to believe that Golden Gate Associates, Inc., had engaged or was engaging in an unlawful discriminatory practice against the petitioner.
Petition granted, without costs or disbursements, order annulled, on the law, complaint reinstated, and matter remitted to the State Division of Human Rights for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- CUNY-Hostos Community College v. State Human Rights Appeal BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- New York City Board of Education v. BatistaNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Steins v. State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Murapa v. KramarskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
3Cited by3 opinions
- Human Development Services of Port Chester, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Village of Port ChesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Verderber v. Roechling Steel, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Ragnetti v. State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985