Legal Opinion

Verderber v. Roechling Steel, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 8, 1985PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The record indicates that the division’s human rights specialist investigated the allegation of sexual discrimination in the complaint by reviewing the complaint itself, by speaking with complainant when he called to clarify his complaint, by reviewing the affidavits of the only other full-time employees in respondent’s office (i.e., complainant’s superior, who fired complainant and complainant’s co-worker), by speaking with and reading a letter submitted by respondent’s attorney, by speaking with a former part-time employee of respondent at the request of complainant, and by reading a letter…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Office of Drug Abuse Services v. State Human Rights Appeal BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. New York City Board of Education v. BatistaNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Tirino v. Long Island Jewish-Hillside Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. State Division of Human Rights v. Oswald Hof Brau Haus, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  5. Rush v. State Human Rights Appeal BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Maltsev v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Masserman v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. Matter of Ackerman v. New York State Div. of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API