Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Badillo v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided March 12, 1998No. 04-97-00129-CRPublished

1ConcurrenceRickhoff, Justice

I must concur in the majority opinion. I write only to urge the legislature to abandon our paternalistic “accomplice witness rule.” See Tex.Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 38.14 (Vernon 1979). Pursuant to this rule, “[a] *861conviction cannot be had upon the testimony of an accomplice unless corroborated by other evidence tending to connect the defendant with the offense committed.” Id. This is a rule that never found acceptance at common law. See 7 John HenRY Wigmore, Evidence in Trials at Common Law § 2056 (Chad-bourn rev. ed.1978). From this record, one can surmise that it was the potential…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Graham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  2. H.E. Butt Grocery Co. v. Bilotto, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
  3. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API