Legal Opinion

H.E. Butt Grocery Co. v. Bilotto

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided August 19, 1996No. 04-94-00116-CVPublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LÓPEZ, Justice.

Vinnie Bilotto recovered a judgment against H.E. Butt Grocery Company (HEB) for injuries Bilotto suffered as a result of a slip-and-fall accident. HEB contends, in its sole point of error, that the trial court erred in informing the jury of the legal effect of its answers by conditioning the damage question on finding Bilotto 50% or less negligent. We disagree with HEB and affirm the trial court’s decision.

HEB specifically asserts that the trial court erred in informing the jury that a percent-responsibility finding in excess of 50% for Bilotto would preclude Bilotto from…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Keetch v. Kroger Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Texas Department of Human Services v. E.B.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Mobil Chemical Company v. BellTexas Supreme Court · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Marin Real Estate Partners, L.P. v. VogtCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2011
  2. America's Favorite Chicken Co. v. Samaras, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
  3. H.E. Butt Grocery Co. v. BilottoTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Middleton, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  5. Montes v. Pendergrass, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2001

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API