Mapp v. Burnham
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The judgment appealed from and the order of the Appellate Division brought up for review should be reversed, with costs, and the petition dismissed. The determination of respondent Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (the PA) terminating petitioner’s employment is supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 NY2d 222, 230 [1974]). Evidence in the record supports the finding that petitioner misled the American Red Cross concerning his…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Rutkunas v. StoutNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- Scahill v. Greece Central School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sindoni v. County of TiogaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Wilson v. Town of Minerva Town BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Matter of Cupo v. Uniondale Fire Dist.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Guynup v. County of ClintonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Covert v. Schuyler CountyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.