Legal Opinion

Guynup v. County of Clinton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 22, 2011PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKavanagh, J.

*1391A hearing was held pursuant to Civil Service Law § 75 after which a Hearing Officer found petitioner guilty of insubordination (charge 1) and incompetence (charge 3), but dismissed the remaining charges. As for his penalty, the Hearing Officer recommended that petitioner be required to participate in an employee assistance program and be suspended without pay for 30 days. As the appointed authority designated to review this report and the Hearing Officer’s findings, respondent Michael E. Zurlo, the Clinton County Administrator, agreed that petitioner was guilty of insubordination and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Longton v. Village of CorinthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Lory v. County of WashingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Mapp v. BurnhamNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Guynup v. County of ClintonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Billings v. County of St. LawrenceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Turzik v. VanBlarcumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Knox v. VanBlarcumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. In re the Claim of GuynupAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. In re the Claim of GuynupAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  5. Knox v. VanBlarcumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API