Legal Opinion

Simpson v. Hubert

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 24, 1971No. Docket 10075PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

The complaint of plaintiff, James Simpson, alleges that on March 29,1967, the defendant, Raymond Hubert, contracted to make a set of dentures and to perform other dental services for the plaintiff. It is further alleged that the defendant was not a licensed dentist, that he falsely represented that he was licensed, and that the services were performed inadequately causing injury and expense to the plaintiff. The complaint states a count sounding in tort for misrepresentation and negligence and a count sounding in contract for breach of contract and warranty.

Plaintiff’s action was commenced on…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Johnson v. CaldwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  2. State Ex Rel. Johnson v. BroderickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Stacey v. PantanoNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Volk v. McCormickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Austro-Hungarian Consul v. G. A. WestphalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. DeHart v. State Board of Registration in PodiatryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Adames v. VelasquezNew York Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API