Legal Opinion

Oakland-Alameda County Coliseum, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 21, 2007No. C06-2328 MHPPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

PATEL, District Judge.

Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment

On September 23, 2005 plaintiff Oakland-Alameda County Coliseum, Inc. (“OACC”) brought this action against National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA (“National Union”) and eight excess insurance carriers 1 alleging breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and seeking declaratory relief.

Now before the court are National Union’s and the excess carriers’ motions for summary judgment. Defendants claim that there is no coverage available under any of the policies…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Masson v. New Yorker Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chicago Title Insurance v. AMZ Insurance Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. Heritage Bank of Commerce v. Zurich American Insurance Company, a New York corporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
  3. Scottsdale Insurance Company v. FinemanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API