Legal Opinion

Kittermaster v. Brossard

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1895PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Wayne. (Frazer, J.) Bill to foreclose a mortgage. Complainant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

Complainant appeals from a pro confesso decree of foreclosure, and the only question raised by the record is his right to have the decree increased by including a fee of $40, provided for by the following clause in the mortgage:

“And it is further expressly agreed that as often as any proceeding is taken to foreclose this mortgage, either by virtue of the power of sale herein contained or in chancery, or in any other manner provided by law, said first parties shall pay said second party forty dollars, as a reasonable solicitor or attorney fee therefor, in addition to all other legal costs, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bullock v. TaylorMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Perrin v. LepperMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Bendey v. TownsendSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Wright v. TraverMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Van Marter v. McMillanMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. AllenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Salvador v. ConnorMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Curtis v. MuellerMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Young, Ex'r v. State Bank of MarshallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  5. United Growth Corp. v. Kelly Mortgage & Investment Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API