Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Kuida

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1950No. 5096PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATTERSON, Superioi Judge.

Joseph A. Bailey and Eva M. Bailey, husband and wife, hereafter called plaintiffs, brought an action against Walter B. Kuida and Christine M. Kuida, husband and wife, hereafter called defendants, to rescind a contract of sale and purchase of real estate.

The sale was negotiated through J. W. Carter, a real estate broker, as agent for defendants. Carter represented to plaintiffs before an agreement was signed that in-his opinion the property could be used for construction of an apartment house thereon.

His testimony in part is as follows :

“Q. And it is true, is it not,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Light v. Chandler Improvement Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Winn v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Scott v. Albemarle Horse Show Ass'nSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  4. Bozdech v. Montana Ranches Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Tupy v. KocourekSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Alaface v. National Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  2. Armer v. ArmerArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Miller v. BoegerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  4. Han v. HorwitzCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  5. HSL Linda Gardens Properties, Ltd. v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API