Legal Opinion

Han v. Horwitz

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 17, 1965No. 2 CA-CIV 10PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HATHAWAY, Judge.

Lawrence and Elizabeth Han, plaintiffs below, filed an action to rescind a purchase of realty on the grounds that they had been fraudulently induced to enter into the contract to purchase by misrepresentations of a realty salesman. At the close of plaintiff’s case, defendants’ motion for a directed verdict was granted and judgment entered in accordance therewith, from which this appeal is brought by the plaintiffs.

In substance plaintiffs’ assignments of error present the following questions for our consideration:

1. - Did the lower court err in directing a verdict for the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Throop v. FE Young and CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Rundle v. WintersArizona Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Slow Development Company v. CoulterArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Preston v. DenkinsArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Henderson v. BreesmanArizona Supreme Court · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Correa v. Pecos Valley Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  2. Apolito v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  3. Spudnuts, Inc. v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  4. Apolito v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  5. Falcher v. St. Luke's Hospital Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API