Legal Opinion

BD. OF TRUSTEES OKL. CITY POLICE PEN. & RET. v. Clark

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 18, 1983No. 54802PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPALA, Justice:

The issue presented is whether a police officer — permanently partially disabled in line of duty but capable of satisfactorily performing sedentary duties — is entitled to disability allowance under 11 O.S.Supp.1977 §§ 50-101 1 et seq. We answer in the negative.

The applicant for disability allowance, a patrolman with the Oklahoma City Police Department, was injured in the line of duty and, as a direct result, suffered permanent nerve damage to his right foot. Following his accident, the applicant was reassigned to the communications unit where his duties were mainly sedentary.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Tisdale v. Wheeler Bros. Grain Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  2. Spencer v. YeraceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Tillman v. SibblesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  4. Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  5. Brooks v. Pension BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mayor of Baltimore v. HackelyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  2. Oklahoma Department of Public Safety v. McCradySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  3. Brodsky v. Phoenix P.D. Ret. Sys. Bd.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  4. Snider v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  5. In Re Anderson's Application for Disability BenefitsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API