BD. OF TRUSTEES OKL. CITY POLICE PEN. & RET. v. Clark
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Justice:
The issue presented is whether a police officer — permanently partially disabled in line of duty but capable of satisfactorily performing sedentary duties — is entitled to disability allowance under 11 O.S.Supp.1977 §§ 50-101 1 et seq. We answer in the negative.
The applicant for disability allowance, a patrolman with the Oklahoma City Police Department, was injured in the line of duty and, as a direct result, suffered permanent nerve damage to his right foot. Following his accident, the applicant was reassigned to the communications unit where his duties were mainly sedentary.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Tisdale v. Wheeler Bros. Grain Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Spencer v. YeraceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1971
- Tillman v. SibblesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Brooks v. Pension BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mayor of Baltimore v. HackelyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Oklahoma Department of Public Safety v. McCradySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Brodsky v. Phoenix P.D. Ret. Sys. Bd.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- Snider v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- In Re Anderson's Application for Disability BenefitsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991