Legal Opinion

Nicholls v. Boyne City Lumber Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1909No. Docket No. 121PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Charlevoix; Mayne, J. Bill by John Nicholls and Mary R. Morgan against the Boyne City Lumber Company to determine the boundary and riparian rights of certain real estate. From an order overruling a demurrer to the bill, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.

In this cause the complainants filed their bill of complaint, averring that they and their grantors by mesne conveyances had in 1879 become the owners of the southwest fractional quarter of section 35, town 33 north, range 6 west, bordering upon the shore of Pine Lake; that they proceeded to plat that portion of it lying along the lake shore and east of the section line between sections 84 and 35, and that portion of said plat adjoining immediately said section line was described as “block J that the defendant owns block J, and by reason thereof is entitled to and owns all that accretion…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Andries v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Wykes v. RinglebergMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Kilgannon v. JenkinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Dolan v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Warren v. WarrenMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Warner v. NobleMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Lamberton v. PawloskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Hendershott v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Miscotten v. HellenthalMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Nicholls v. W. H. White Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API