Legal Opinion

Wykes v. Ringleberg

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1883PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Grand Rapids. Bill for injunction. Complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Graves, O. J.

Complainant and defendant’s wife are owners of two parcels of land in the city of Grand Rapids ■supposed to be adjoining. The parcel of Mrs. Ringleberg abuts Wealthy avenue on the north and Grandville avenue on the west, and the premises of complainant lie immediately east and also abut Wealthy avenue on the north and are supposed to be divided from Mrs. Ringleberg’s land by a line running south or southerly from that avenue. As 'a consequence of the grading of these streets the surface of ■these parcels is left six or seven feet above the grade. The -complainant occupies his…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Blackwood v. Van VleetMichigan Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Warner v. NobleMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Rawls v. Tallahassee Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1901
  3. Wilmarth v. WoodcockMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Campbell v. Kent Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Andries v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1895

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API