Legal Opinion
Fryer v. ASAP FIRE AND SAFETY CORP., INC.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided December 15, 2010No. Civil Action 09-10178-MBBPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S SECOND MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND FOR POST-TRIAL INTEREST ON THE FEES (DOCKET ENTRY #82); PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO CORRECT INTEREST AWARDED (DOCKET ENTRY # 85); DEFENDANT A.S.A.P. AND SAFETY CORPORATION, INC.’S, DEFENDANT JOSEPH SHEEDY’S AND DEFENDANT BRIAN COTE’S MOTION TO CORRECT A CLERICAL MISTAKE AND/OR MISTAKE PURSUANT TO RULE 60 (DOCKET ENTRY # 87)
BOWLER, United States Magistrate Judge.
In two post trial motions, the parties seek to correct a mistake in the calculation of postjudgment interest on an attorneys’ fee award of $178,144.28 under Rule 60,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. BonjornoSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Higgins v. New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Ellis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- International Woodworkers of America, Afl-Cio and Its Local No. 5-376 v. Champion International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fiallos v. Hamzah Slaughter House LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2022
- Knox v. Hooper's Crab House, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2019
- Knox v. Hooper's Crab House, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2019