Legal Opinion

Alexander ex rel. Alexander v. Elkins

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1915PublishedCited by 6 opinions

FROM BRADLEY. J Appeal from the Chancery Court of Bradley County. —-V. C. Allen, Chancellor. J

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Neil

The hill alleges, in substance, that a short time prior to November 12, 1912, complainant and defendant Mande Alexander (formerly Elkins) intermarried; that they were both minors, and are still under age -that after living together a few months they separated, the wife returning to the home of her father, defendant James P. Elkins; that there was much controversy between the respective families as to which one was to blame, and in consequence great bitterness grew np; that soon after the separation the said defendant Elkins began a crusade against the complainant for the purpose of compelling…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Poyer v. Village of Des PlainesIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Hall v. DunnOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Kelly v. ConnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Wallack v. Society for Reformation of Juvenile DelinquentsNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  5. Crighton v. DahmerMississippi Supreme Court · 1893

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Title Guaranty & Trust Co. v. BushnellTennessee Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Shuman v. GilbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  3. Clinton Books, Inc. v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Brewster Aeronautical Corp. v. FenerNew York Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Shannon Giles v. Geico General Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API