Legal Opinion

Brewster Aeronautical Corp. v. Fener

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1949PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPecora, J.

Motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to subdivision 5 of rule 106 of the Buies of Civil Practice is denied. The complaint states a cause of action for an injunction to restrain defendants from continuing their acts and conspiracy to harass and vex the plaintiffs by commencing a series of actions against plaintiffs without intending to bring the same to trial and thereby irreparably damaging plaintiffs and stockholders through thwarting the dissolution of Brewster Aeronautical Corporation and the distribution of its assets. The details of the acts committed in furtherance of the conspiracy…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Renfro v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Steinberg v. McKayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  3. Shevalier v. StephensonNebraska Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Alexander ex rel. Alexander v. ElkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Faske v. GershmanCity of New York Municipal Court · 1961
  2. Brewster Aeronautical Corp. v. FenerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API