Legal Opinion

People v. Tufts

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 14, 1986No. Nos. 85SA138, 85SA139PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtErickson, Justice

This is an interlocutory appeal by the prosecution from an order suppressing evidence in a narcotics case. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

I

Defendants, David Wilder Tufts and Paul Joseph Davidson, are charged with possession and sale of a schedule II controlled substance and conspiracy to sell a schedule II controlled substance. § 18-18-105, 8 C.R.S. (1985 Supp.). The defendants filed motions to suppress which were granted by the trial court. The facts necessary to the resolution of this appeal were developed at the suppression hearings held on February 21, March 21, and April…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. People v. HeartySupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  3. People v. HazelhurstSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  4. People v. LujanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
  5. People v. HenrySupreme Court of Colorado · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. TrujilloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  2. People v. DiazSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  3. People v. JuarezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  4. People v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  5. People v. CrowSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API