Legal Opinion
Rotan v. Egan
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 11, 1988No. 81-1036, 84-1507PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MACK, Associate Judge:
This is an appeal from a jury verdict in favor of appellee physicians against Ernestine J. Rotan and her husband, Bernie Ro-tan, in a medical malpractice suit. The suit alleged that Mrs. Rotan developed a bacterial growth on her heart valve which ultimately required replacement of the valve as a result of appellees’ negligent care, diagnosis, and treatment. Appellants claim that several of the trial court’s evidentiary rulings are in error. 1 None of the issues raised warrant reversal.
I
Ernestine J. Rotan became a patient of the appellee obstetrics/gynecology medical…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Morrison v. MacNamaraDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
- Payne v. Soft Sheen Products, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Adkins v. MortonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Martineau v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lyons v. BarrazottoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Weiner v. KnellerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Durant v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- District of Columbia v. AndersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Kling v. PetersDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.