Legal Opinion

Hafer v. Marsh

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1943No. 28841PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

— Plaintiff brought action for unlawful detainer of certain real estate by the defendants, after the latter had failed to comply with the statutory notice to pay rent or surrender the premises. The complaint sought restitution of the rented property, forfeiture of the defendants’ tenancy, and a judgment against the tenants for twice the amount of rent alleged to be due from them. Defendants denied the material allegations of the complaint, and set up five affirmative defenses and a counterclaim, which, in turn, were put in issue by plaintiff’s reply.

The cause was tried to the court without a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Linden v. BungeWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Tjosevig v. WilbourneWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Sengfelder v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Lecocq Motors, Inc. v. Whatcom CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Blouen v. Quimpere Canning Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. CoffeltWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Coeur D'Alene v. MarshWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Bedgisoff v. MorganWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Bedgisoff v. MorganWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Dill v. ZielkeWashington Supreme Court · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API