Legal Opinion

State v. Hall

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 2, 1965No. 1PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggiNS, J.

The record comes to us in a condensed form as a pauper appeal. The evidence is somewhat equivocal as to the caution given by the officers to the defendant that he had a right to remain silent and was not required to answer questions, or that any statement he made might be used against him in court. On the other hand, the defendant’s objections appear somewhat by inference. However, enough appears to warrant the trial court in finding the defendant was advised of his right to refuse to incriminate himself and likewise require this Court to consider the fundamental question whether, under the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Agnello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Amos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. State v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
  2. State v. ReamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. State v. McCloudSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  4. State v. WoodsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. State v. SilvaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API