Legal Opinion

Holston River Electric Co. v. Hydro Electric Corp.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1933PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swiggart

delivered tlie opinion of the Court.

By overruling a demurrer filed by the complainant, Holston River Electric Company, to the defendant’s cross-bill, the chancellor ruled that a franchise issued in 1932 by the town of Rogersville to the Hydro Electric Corporation, authorizing it to distribute and sell electric power within the city, was valid and effective without approval of the Railroad and Public Utilities Commission of the state.

Complainant’s appeal, granted by the chancellor in his discretion, presents this ruling for review.

At the time the municipal franchise was granted to the Hydro…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fort v. NoeTennessee Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Franklin Light & Power Co. v. Southern Cities Power Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Dagley v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  4. State ex rel. Thompson v. Nashville Ry. & Light Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Patterson v. City of ChattanoogaTennessee Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Roberts v. Cahill Forge & Foundry Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Hutchison v. MontgomeryTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Automatic Merchandising Co. v. AtkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Dearing v. Brush Creek Coal Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API