Legal Opinion

Hutchison v. Montgomery

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1938PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

Does the Inheritance Tax Law, Code, sections 1259-1295, inclusive, as amended, impose a tax to be apportioned ratably among the heirs taking the real property and the distributees taking the personal property of a decedent who left no will, or is the tax imposed upon the estate to be paid out of personal property in the hands of the administrator, without right to require contribution from the heirs?

The complainants are the widow, who is the sole dis-tributee of decedent, and the administrator. The de fendants are collateral ldn who have inherited decedent’s real property. The suit is to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Young Men's Christian Assn. of Columbus v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Stebbins v. RileySupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. State v. AlstonTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Plunkett v. Old Colony Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  5. Crenshaw v. MooreTennessee Supreme Court · 1911

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Merchants & Planters Bank v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1982
  2. Nashville Trust Co. v. Com'r of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
  3. Bergeda v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Mitchell v. CarsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Knoxtenn Theatres, Inc. v. DanceTennessee Supreme Court · 1948

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API