Legal Opinion

Automatic Merchandising Co. v. Atkins

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1959PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Tomlinson

By reason of the State’s demand, Automatic Merchandising Company paid under protest a certain gross receipts privilege tax; then sued the Commissioner for recovery thereof on the insistence that it did not owe the tax. The Chancellor allowed the recovery, and the State has appealed.

The tax in question is that levied by 67-4203, Item 65 (e) T.C.A. for the privilege of engaging in the merchandise vending machine business. That tax is payable on August 1 for the fiscal year beginning the preceding July 1. — 67-4317 T.C.A. At the option of the taxpayer, it may be paid at a fixed time “on a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. GrosvenorTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  2. State ex rel. Davidson County Board of Education v. PollardTennessee Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Nashville Tobacco Works v. City of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Holston River Electric Co. v. Hydro Electric Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Williams v. Cravens Et Ux.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lee Medical, Inc. v. Paula BeecherTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Sallee v. BarrettTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Tidwell v. Servomation-Willoughby CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Steppach v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2011
  5. NAJO Equipment Leasing, LLC v. Commissioner of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API