Legal Opinion
Smith v. Hertz Rent-A-Car
Municipal Court of The Virgin Islands
Decided October 20, 1965No. 61-1965PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Michael, Municipal Judge
OPINION
This action was instituted by plaintiff against the defendants Hertz Rent-A-Car and Bernard C. Heyl to recover damages as the result of an automobile collision between his car, driven by himself, and one belonging to the defendant Hertz and driven by the defendant Heyl.
Prior to the commencement of the action plaintiff registered a lien against the vehicle of the defendant Hertz which *269was involved in the collision pursuant to 20 V.I.C. § 542, which provides as follows:
“Any person who is injured by a motor vehicle or whose property is damaged thereby shall have a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- J. W. Goldsmith, Jr.-Grant Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Mack v. WestbrookSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
- Merchants & Planters Bank v. BrigmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1917
- Hall v. LockeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1921
- Rent-A-Car Co. v. BelfordTennessee Supreme Court · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Randolph Smith v. Hertz Rent-A-Car and Bernard HeylCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967