Legal Opinion

Rent-A-Car Co. v. Belford

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1932PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swiggart

The facts material to the issue presented by the appeal in error were stipulated in the circuit court.'

The plaintiff, Belford, suffered personal injuries when struck by an automobile owned by the Rent-A-Car Company. The automobile was being driven at a rate of speed in excess of twenty miles an hour by a driver to whom the automobile had been rented by the owner, so as to create in plaintiff a lien on the automobile, under Acts 1929, chapter 87, reenacted by Acts 1931, chapter 82. After the: accident, but before suit was brought, the automobile was sold by the Rent-A-Car Company to the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Moore v. Carey Bros. Oil Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  2. Parker-Harris Co. v. TateTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Merchants & Planters Bank v. BrigmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1917
  4. Core v. ReshaTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Heck v. MorganWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Shelby County Health Care Corp. v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  2. East Tennessee & Western North Carolina Motor Transp. Co. v. BrooksTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
  3. County Board of Supervisors of Platte Co. v. BreeseNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Phifer v. Gulf Oil CorporationTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Randolph Smith v. Hertz Rent-A-Car and Bernard HeylCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API